What it does

evil-read-arxiv is a kit of Claude Code CLI skills and a companion web app that hunts papers across arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and DBLP (for top-tier conferences), scores them on relevance + recency + popularity + quality, then generates structured Markdown notes and extracts figures into your Obsidian vault. You type start my day; it does the rest.

The interesting bit

The scoring is explicit and tweakable—four dimensions for daily arXiv, three for conference papers (relevance 40%, popularity 40%, quality 20%)—and the web app learns your preferences after ten feedback clicks, adjusting weights accordingly. It is essentially a personalized recommender system where the “user profile” is a YAML file and some Claude prompts.

Key highlights

• CLI skills: start-my-day, paper-analyze, extract-paper-images, paper-search, and conf-papers for CVPR/NeurIPS/etc.
• Web app (Next.js 16, React 19): AI batch-summaries, on-demand deep analysis, drag-and-drop favorites, bilingual UI, mobile swipe cards.
• Structured output: auto-generated sections for background, method, experiments, limitations, and related-work comparison.
• Figure extraction: prefers arXiv source packages, falls back to PDF rasterization.
• Knowledge graph: updates links between papers and keywords inside Obsidian.

Caveats

• Requires an Anthropic API key and a fairly specific Obsidian directory layout (10_Daily/, 20_Research/Papers/, 99_System/Config/).
• The web app and CLI skills have separate configuration paths; the README warns you not to mix them up.
• Conference-paper deep analysis only triggers if the paper has an arXiv ID.

Verdict

Great for researchers drowning in preprints who already live in Obsidian and do not mind wiring up API keys and YAML configs. If you just want casual paper alerts, this is overkill; if you want a systematic reading pipeline, it is a solid scaffold.